• Landed!
  • Posts
  • The Fallout around the JOLTS Report đŸ˜”â€đŸ’«

The Fallout around the JOLTS Report đŸ˜”â€đŸ’«

Plus ideas for transitioning from the federal government to the private sector, and some thoughts of major events in the news.

In partnership with

Finally, a powerful CRM—made simple.

Attio is the AI-native CRM built to scale your company from seed stage to category leader. Powerful, flexible, and intuitive to use, Attio is the CRM for the next-generation of teams.

Sync your email and calendar, and Attio instantly builds your CRM—enriching every company, contact, and interaction with actionable insights in seconds.

With Attio, AI isn’t just a feature—it’s the foundation.

  • Instantly find and route leads with research agents

  • Get real-time AI insights during customer conversations

  • Build AI automations for your most complex workflows

  • Join fast growing teams like Flatfile, Replicate, Modal, and more.

Sponsors help keep this newsletter free so show them some love with a click!
That way, I can keep my content free for you! 😇

Career Resources

  • Find our job board, a referral link to Zapier, and more here.

  • My network is hiring! I’ve worked with Chris’s agency and am happy to make referrals here if this role piques your interest!

  • Saw this article from Emily Kurze around how pretty efficient and successful job search and thought the insights might be useful.

  • And this one is just for a laugh because if we don’t laugh, we’ll cry!

  • Very real issue that Katie Rakusin pointed out this week around typos in emails - I would guestimate that I see this in about 1% of applications (I try to correct them when I catch it, but often I don’t notice until someone requests a status update).

  • Some powerful insights here from Professor Keon West. You can grab their book, The Science of Racism here. (For a non-Amazon option, you can grab it here but it’s 2x the price so wanted to offer both.)

Fraudulent Candidates

Last week, I spoke with Business Insider about candidates using AI in their job searches (it’s here, but behind a paywall - I haven’t even read it!) and during that chat with the reporter, we went down a rabbit hole around fraudulent candidates. She was shocked to learn this is happening at all, but I reassured her, it’s pretty rare - maybe a handful a month that we’re aware of.

This week, I spoke with our ATS company (Ashby) about this topic, and was shocked to learn it’s way more common than I thought. They don’t have great data here, but the person I spoke with said he estimates anywhere from 20-50% of candidates for remote engineering jobs are FAKE.

Engineering is definitely the big area these bad actors target, but this makes me think it’s likely much higher than expected for other roles as well in remote environments.

This is one reason I would really encourage all of you to be careful how you show up, especially for remote work - I worry as remote companies get more and more vigilante, even being perceived as AI (no picture on LinkedIn, AI-generated resume/responses, etc.), you could put yourself at risk.

In the News

  • The big headline this week: the firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the BLS. There’s many conversations we can have here - how is the data collected and why are we seeing such big revisions? Is this firing legal? What does this signal about our ever more fragile democracy? And how are we continuing to see historically low rates of unemployment if there’s such little job creation? I’ve got a part one and part two!

  • The other big headline: updates to Workday’s lawsuit! Workday is now being asked to provide a list of those who used it HiredScore features. Interestingly, the lawsuit claiming a decade of AI-driven discrimination via Workday was filed in 2023 while HiredScore wasn’t implemented until 2024 so it’s hard to blame AI specifically for the discrimination those in the collective action claim (though that doesn’t mean they didn’t experience other. I continue to be super curious how this pans out. It may make employers even more cautious about implementing AI features as part of hiring processes, it may leave companies building platforms to aid in hiring more cautious around building AI features. Or it may reveal that AI tools actually aren’t the problem, humans are.

🙋Answering Your Questions🙋

This is a question I received via LinkedIn - I know it’s a relevant topic so I am incorporating it here as well.

I have a question for you, and I am also asking a few other recruiters to get your views. With the current displacement of U.S. Federal employees, many individuals like myself who have dedicated their careers to the Federal workforce are wondering how to compete in the private sector.

I am going to use myself as a prime example since there are a lot like me. I work in IT, and while many offices I've been in have provided training to stay up to date, they haven't allowed us to obtain certifications. Although most positions do not offer opportunities in marketing or sales, we possess skills and experience from similar work, training, and convincing other offices and bureaus that certain approaches are effective.

However, when my colleagues and I apply for positions in the private sector, I often find that our Government experience is met with skepticism. For instance, as a project manager, I oversee the IT budget, build contracts, vet vendors, and develop automated environments to support others. Periodically, I've heard that these responsibilities weren't part of my role because of my title.

Many Federal positions contain multiple duties beyond what the job title reflects. I make sure to highlight this in my resume, but I also try to trim it down to fit within two pages; otherwise, it would be too extensive. I understand that when applying for a role like IT Director, recruiters usually prefer candidates with experience at companies like Facebook or Google. Compared to a Federal employee with similar experience, the job titles differ due to the way Federal positions are labeled. Still, the relevant skills are outlined clearly in the resume.

Given all of this, how do you think U.S. Federal employees like myself, who have spent their careers in Government service, can effectively compete with candidates from the private sector?

I appreciate your honesty and the time you took to respond, which will help me to pass this along and tailor my job hunting accordingly.

Making major career pivots is always hard, but even harder when you’re in a competitive job market.

So a few tips:

  1. Translate.
    Most recruiters in a corporate environment aren’t going to understand the scope of federal roles and the titling structures so make sure you frame your experience in language that resonates with your audience. They usually have lots of options and little incentive to figure out how your background aligns so the onus is on you to make your case.
    This includes metrics around your impact, and translating your title (so for example, you can add in parentheses “Director-level” if your project manager title might be confusing and misrepresent your experience.

  2. Target the right role and companies
    I think a pivot calls for being realistic about where your experiences translate best. Coming from the government, you could bring a great perspective to companies that are government contractors. A sales or customer success role supporting government clients might be a good fit where your background gives you credibility.
    School districts and non-profits often value generalist skills and may be a better fit as well.
    On the flip side, you may have a tougher time being competitive for roles with large applicant pools and where you’re banking heavily on transferable skills - you may have build some skills relevant to marketing and sales through your cross-functional collaboration in your position but most companies can hire someone with more relevant experience so it’s unlikely you’ll come out on top.

  3. Boosting credentials
    You noted you haven’t had the chance to get certifications and such; I would probably look across the jobs you’re applying for and identify a few that you’re most qualified for. Look for trends in their requirements and see if you can get 1-2 certifications that most align with what’s being asked for.
    You can also see themes in the platforms they want experience with and get familiar with those.
    Finally, I’ve seen people give the illusion of a credential or training by saying things like “operating with MEDDPICC principles” or “working towards PMP” for example.

The last thing I’ll share on this topic: I do not think most people need a resume writer or career coach (and I don’t think you do either!) But I think it can be MORE helpful in these cases where norms across industries are so different. I would try it on your own for a bit but if you can’t get traction, you might consider a coach who specializes in transitions from the government.

For more resources to support you in your search, check out my Linktree.
My content is seen by over 8 million people each month. Need help getting the word out about your brand? Let’s connect!